Modern vs. Western Thought: Cultural Determinism by William H. Young | NAS (2022)

Cultural determinism is the belief that culture rather than nature or biology determines who we are at emotional and behavioral levels.[1]

In the early twentieth century, departing from Western and founding beliefs, American social science adopted the belief that the individual and human nature are entirely socially constructed by society or culture—cultural determinism.

In mid-century, as foreseen in The Lonely Crowd (1950)[2] by David Riesman, the social character of Americans began to change to “other-directed”—by the feelings of the social class or group to which they belonged—a form of cultural determinism. But a national character and the traditional ideal of national unity and assimilation of cultures remained.

Over the last half of the twentieth century, an already entrenched cultural determinism turned to the novel concepts of multiculturalism and diversity, in which the identity and interests of marginalized oppressed groups became a regnant cultural belief that first captured the academy and then American society.

Multiculturalism

Multiculturalism is generally defined as the existence, acceptance, or promotion of multiple cultural traditions within a single jurisdiction, usually considered in terms of the culture associated with an ethnic group.[3]

In the early 1970s, the Ford Foundation chose multiculturalism—over our traditional meritocratic and assimilationist ideals, including progressivism—as the model for a future America. It implemented a vision of America as a conglomerate of separate and disparate races, ethnicities, and subnational cultures, in which individuals were defined by their group membership. Their idea was that diversity and group identity rather than unity and national identity should become America’s overriding ideals. It saw that the university had become the battleground in the effort to force multiculturalism into the intellectual and educational life of the country, and it facilitated that objective.[4]

A major influence on the evolution of that multiculturalism came from the late Italian cultural Marxist Antonio Gramsci when the translation into English of his Prison Notebooks (1971) brought his ideas of cultural determinism (Gramsci’s own term was “cultural hegemony”) to America. John Fonte explains that, like Marx, Gramsci argued that “all societies in human history have been divided into two basic groups: the privileged and the marginalized, the oppressor and the oppressed, the dominant and the subordinate.” Gramsci expanded Marx’s ranks of the oppressed to include women and minority groups, as well as the economically marginalized. In Gramsci’s ideology, “white males replace capitalists as the oppressors and women and minorities replace workers as the oppressed.”[5]

In Gramsci’s Marxist philosophy, “cultural hegemony” is the domination of a culturally diverse society by the ruling class who manipulate the culture of the society.[6] Gramsci’s battle cry for his marginalized cultural groups was first to “capture the culture” by gaining influence or control over the institutions through which consciousness was formed and public opinion was shaped: schools, universities, art, and the media. Later, the marginalized groups would become dominant through political power, with civil society being a major battleground.[7]

Gramsci’s ideas of cultural determinism were embraced by the Academic Left as endowing the intellectual with the revolutionary role in overthrowing the hegemony of the dominant traditional American culture. In The Rise and Fall of the American Left (1992), John Patrick Diggins illustrates Gramsci’s Marxist influence using documentation such as The Left Academy: Marxist Scholarship on American Campuses (1984), which announced that “its initial results are evident throughout the academy.”[8]

(Video) Determinism vs Free Will: Crash Course Philosophy #24

Marginalized-victim group multiculturalism soon swept through public education, turning teaching further away from knowledge and towards advocacy of social justice for oppressed groups. Political correctness became the dominant ideology of both subjectivity and behavioral determinism—and of the academy, the media and Hollywood. One had to observe the new moral absolutes: diversity, reproductive choice, tolerance, sensitivity, and sexual orientation, which quickly became mandatory.

Cultural determinism through multiculturalism features relativism rather than reason or truth. The concern of multiculturalism is not economics or material welfare, but recognition or esteem; it is not income but identity, dignity, and recognition (compulsory external affirmation of victim groups by their oppressors); it is not Western capitalism but Western culture that oppresses. Political economy is replaced by identity politics. Multiculturalism focuses on the welfare of identity groups. Last, oppression is viewed as a relatively permanent feature of human life, stemming directly from a psychological drive for esteem and cultural hegemony, or something like Nietzsche’s will-to-power.

Multiculturalism holds that only cultural artifacts and particulars such as ritual, superstition, kinship ties, dress, diet, and sex are important. The transcendent ideals, abstract ideas, and traditional wisdom of Western civilization that informed America’s Founders have been replaced by the superficial detail of everyday life. Like the Greek Cynics, present-day multiculturalists argue that wisdom comes from habits of daily living, not from knowledge or tradition. Multicultural trivia are thus as valid and important as knowledge. Cultural relativism results in a race to the bottom rather than to excellence and advancement in a society or individuals—one principal reason for the debasement of our children’s education and capabilities.

Multiculturalism presents the historical account of America as the story of subjugation of oppressed groups, which is “rooted in the work of Marxist historians and social scientists,” notes Peter Wood in Diversity; The Invention of a Concept (2003). A review by a panel of distinguished historians in 2004 found social studies textbooks to be “mostly a disgrace that, in the name of political correctness and multiculturalism, fail to give students an honest account of American history.”[9]

After the 1970s, universities turned to proportional representation of ascriptive groups. In Part III, of his essay, “Domestic Faction in a Republic,” George Seaver explains that multiculturalism “found that civic virtue imposed unacceptable hierarchies, privilege and oppression in society.” Virtue became a construct of the individual or cultural group, “with no significance of one over the other. Hierarchy was abhorrent, and any attempt to impose one led to ‘privileging’ and oppressing the ‘Other’ in society.[10] The antidote for such privileging was “social justice,” for the group, not the individual.

Not only American history but the history and literature of Western civilization have largely been extirpated from college undergraduate education in the name of multiculturalism.

Diversity

The diversity ideology became the formal successor to multiculturalism and now holds the academy in the iron grip of cultural determinism that dominates academic as well as administrative life. Diversity holds that assimilation into the mainstream—the traditional and successful American multicultural process—is “oppressive” and “coercive,” observes Wood in Diversity. Thus, the pursuit of diversity is held to be both practically good and personally redemptive, if not virtuous, despite a conspicuous lack of any evidence of its claimed benefits. “In just a few years, diversity became America’s most visible cultural ideal….a cliché that promotes group stereotypes and undermines any real diversity of ideas and individuals….[and] validates only a narrow hierarchy of difference, asserting the principle that people are, above all else, members of social groups and products of the historical experiences of those groups….Diversity as it is practiced today is anti-individualist and at odds with America’s older ideals of liberty and equality.”[11]

There is evidence that diversity has had a quite negative, not positive, effect on society in at least the short- to medium-run, in a five-year project by noted Harvard political scientist Robert Putnam, who considers that diversity can have long-range benefits for society. His study, involving 30,000 interviews in 41 U. S. communities and presented as his 2006 Johan Skytte Prize Lecture, found that social solidarity and social capital are actually diminished in ethnically-diverse communities: people trust each other less, including members of their own groups; reciprocity, altruism, and cooperation are rarer; confidence in local institutions is weaker; friendships are fewer; and there is less happiness—regardless of age or income level. Putnam is concerned that his findings may underestimate the effects of diversity on social withdrawal.[12]

This should not be surprising. More than two millennia ago, the Greeks and then the Romans first replaced group and tribal rights with individual rights—based on objective principles applicable equally to every individual citizen. In every age in the development of Western civilization—in Greece, Rome, the High Middle Ages, the Renaissance and Reformation, and the Enlightenment—advances were sought to rise above and supersede the ethos and power of groups, tribes, or clans, to free the individual from subordination of his interests to those of the group, whether religious, economic, social, political, racial, or ethnic. The identity-group diversity ideology is not new and has failed repeatedly throughout Western history. Thus, America was founded on the Western concept of the dignity, worth, and autonomy of the individual.

(Video) How language shapes the way we think | Lera Boroditsky

What does Putnam recommend based on his study’s findings? He urges renewal of the American tradition as a successful immigrant nation. That means creating new, cross-cutting forms of social solidarity and more encompassing identities. The study notes that America has done this through popular culture, education, national symbols, and common experiences. Putnam advocates policies explicitly designed to foster a shared sense of citizenship and mutual obligation to speed assimilation, including English-language training. “Our national motto—e pluribus unum—reflects precisely that objective,” concludes Putnam, “namely to create union out of diversity.”[13]

Ironically, Putnam recognizes the need to return to the American ideal before our academic and college-educated elite led us into the cul-de-sac of identity-group diversity ideology: one people speaking a common language (English), ultimately living in harmony and with a common civic identity and sense of unity through consensual assimilation. Tragically, Putnam’s conclusion in E Pluribus Unum that the nation needs once more to “create union out of diversity” continues to be ignored.

Identitarianism and the Arts

Another manifestation of cultural determinism is the “identity politics” of the left or “identitarianism,” which has had a destructive effect on the contemporary arts, described by Sohrab Ahman in The New Philistines: (Provocations) (2017). Ahman argues that the classical liberal West has supported and required a rich interior life and an education heightening our ability to learn from others. At the same time, individuals can express and make intelligible their own interior life and experience, what some term an “expressivist” account of identity. Classical liberal culture “insists there is something in each of us, something unique and immutable, that can’t be reduced to group identities such as race, nationality, gender, sexuality” and that “great art has long made it its business to articulate that irreducible something.”

Identitarians reject individuality, the interior life, and any sense that individuals can, in real and profound ways, communicate themselves. Despite the verbiage, they “celebrate individual difference, so long as you are different in the same way.” In the end, identitarians’ rejection of classical liberalism requires them to reject human persons as they actually are in their concrete individuality, reducing everyone to a caricature of some presumed mass identity, an identity that must never be translated, expressed, or welcomed by the dominant culture. Every group generates and controls its own unique “narrative” that is entirely incommensurable with any others, an absolute relativism of standards.

“This way of thinking about art denies individuality and agency to these groups. They become political types, stand-ins for political causes…rather than individual souls…” The power of art, let alone its beauty, is lost, and the really human things are squelched. Identity politics “can’t grapple with individuality, with things of the soul, with the inner life—the very things that draw us to art in the first place.”

Identitarians reduce everything to “a script imposed by power relations.” Not only masculinity and femininity, sexuality and love, but also judgments about beauty and worth, goodness and truth. Further, since everything is reduced to the “performativity” of power, any sense of art forming or expressing the inner life of the soul is nonsensical. In the end, there is no inner life; everything serves the external political demands of social justice.[14]

Social Justice

And from cultural determinism’s roots in psychological identity and oppression as a permanent feature of life, social justice today has a new meaning to the academic left. Social psychologist Jonathan Haidt argues as follows in an interview by Bari Weiss in an article in The Wall Street Journal:

The left…has undergone an ideological transformation. A generation ago, social justice was understood as equality of treatment and opportunity….Today justice means equal outcomes. “There are two ideas now in the academic left that weren’t there 10 years ago,” he says. One is that everyone is racist because of unconscious bias, and the other is that everything is racist because of systemic racism.” That makes justice impossible to achieve. “When you cross that line into insisting that if there’s not equal outcomes then some people and some institutions and some systems are racist, sexist, then you’re setting yourself up for eternal conflict and injustice.”[15]

(Video) Why humans run the world | Yuval Noah Harari

Cultural determinism’s idea of unending oppression underlies the new concept of social justice.

Modern Thought

The cultural determinism of Modern thought in today’s academy—multiculturalism and diversity driven by identity and interests of marginalized oppressed groups—have led academics towards cultural trivia and administration to dogma and dictatorship. The spread of identity politics through American society is divisive. The academy has a clear indicator that its diversity ideology is divisive, yet it refuses to acknowledge the objective evidence. Instead, it continues the frantic quest in search of still more victim groups on whom to bestow compensatory privileges and entitlements. Thus do such concepts of social justice continue to generate eternal conflict and to accelerate the debasement of higher education.

The next article will examine relativism vice virtue in Modern thought.

This is one of a series of occasional articles applying the lessons of Western civilization to contemporary issues relevant to the academy.

The Honorable William H. Young was appointed by President George H. W. Bush to be Assistant Secretary for Nuclear Energy and served in that position from November 1989 to January 1993. He is the author of Ordering America: Fulfilling the Ideals of Western Civilization (2010) and Centering America: Resurrecting the Local Progressive Ideal (2002).

Image: Public Domain

[1] “Cultural determinism,” Wikipedia, en.wikipedia.org. Nigel Barber, “Why Cultural Determinism Is Not Science,” Psychology Today, 29 November 2012.

[2] David Riesman, with Nathan Glazer and Reuel Denney, The Lonely Crowd: A study of the changing American character, Originally Published 1950, Abridged Edition (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1961).

(Video) #15: Diversity Now vs. Then | Thomas Sattelberger

[3] “Multiculturalism,” Wikipedia, en.wikipedia.org.

[4] Karen Ferguson, “Domesticating Development: The Ford Foundation and Establishment Multiculturalism, 1965–1975,” Conference Paper, Annual Meeting, American Studies Association, 4 February 2009, www.allacademic.com. Charles Sykes and K. L. Billingsley, “How the Ford Foundation Created Multiculturalism,” FrontPage Magazine, 9 January 1994. Alan Charles Kors, “Thought Reform 101: The Orwellian Implications of Today’s College Orientation,” Reason, March 2000, www.reason.com. Fonte, “Culture War: Gramsci vs. Tocqueville,” 15–16. James Pierson, “The Left University: How it was born; how it grew; how to overcome it,” The Weekly Standard, 3 October 2005.

[5] John Fonte, “Why There Is A Culture War: Gramsci and Tocqueville in America,” Policy Review, Heritage Foundation, December 2000–January 2001, 15–16.

[6] “Cultural hegemony,” Wikipedia, en.wikipedia.org.

[7] Fonte, “Culture War: Gramsci and Tocqueville,” 15–16.

[8] John Patrick Diggins, The Rise and Fall of the American Left (New York: W. W. Norton & Company, 1992), 295. Bertell Ollman and Edward Vernoff, The Left Academy: Marxist Scholarship on American Campuses (New York: McGraw-Hill, 1982, 1:1.

[9] George Archibald, “Textbooks flunk tests,” The Washington Times, 28 March 2004.

[10] George Seaver, Domestic Faction in a Republic, Part III, National Association of Scholars, www.nas.org, 25 June 2010.

[11] Peter Wood, Diversity: The Invention of a Concept (San Francisco: Encounter Books, 2003).

[12] Robert D. Putnam, “E Pluribus Unum: Diversity and Community in the Twenty-first Century,” The 2006 Johan Skytte Prize Lecture, 15 June 2007. John Leo, “Bowling With Our Own,” City Journal, Manhattan Institute, 25 June 2007. Jason Richwine, “A Smart Solution to the Diversity Dilemma,” The American, Journal of the American Enterprise Institute, 12 August 2009. Dora L. Costa and Matthew E. Kahn, “Civic Engagement and Community Heterogeneity: An Economist’s Perspective,” Conference on Social Connectedness and Public Activism, Harvard University, May 2002. Daniel Henninger, “The Death of Diversity,” Wonder Land, The Wall Street Journal, 16 August 2007.

(Video) Is life meaningless? And other absurd questions - Nina Medvinskaya

[13] Press Release, “Harvard’s Robert Putnam Spotlights Immigration Discussion Ignores Crucial Need for Social Integration,” Harvard Kennedy School, 18 June 2007.

[14] Sohrab Ahmari, The New Philistines: (Provocations) (London: Biteback Publishing, 2017).

[15] Bari Weiss, “Jonathan Haidt on the Cultural Roots of Campus Rage,” The Wall Street Journal, 31 March 2017.

FAQs

What is cultural determinism according to Winston? ›

Cultural determinism is the belief that the culture in which we are raised determines who we are at emotional and behavioral levels.

Who introduced the cultural determinism theory? ›

Environmental or cultural determinist criticism of biological determinism came from three sources: the behaviorists, a school in psychology; the cultural determinists, who were associated with the anthropologist Franz Boas; and postmodern anthropology and cultural relativism.

Which is the best example of cultural determinism? ›

A good example of this would be someone who is raised in a culture with racist beliefs is then exposed to a different culture with non-racist values. The optimistic version of cultural determinism states that this person could choose to change their beliefs.

When was the term multiculturalism first used? ›

As a philosophy, multiculturalism began as part of the pragmatism movement at the end of the 19th century in Europe and the United States, then as political and cultural pluralism at the turn of the 20th century.

What is the difference between technological determinism and cultural determinism? ›

At its most basic level, technological determinism presumes that a society's technology drives the development of its social structure and cultural values, whilst social determinism is the theory that social interactions and constructs alone determine individual behaviour.

What is the difference between environmental determinism and cultural determinism? ›

Environmental determinism occupies one end of a continuum, cultural determinism occupies the other; each argues that the human condition is determined simply by nature or simply by culture.

What are cultural determinants? ›

Cultural determinants include ethnicity, race, country of origin, language, non verbal communication, acculturation, gender, age, sexual orientation, values, behavior norms, rules, manners, social grouping and relationships, religious and spiritual beliefs, socioeconomic class and education.

Why is cultural determinism considered a problematic perspective? ›

Why does the author of the text suggest that cultural determinism is a troublesome perspective? Because it assumes that culture has more power over individuals than it really does. Culture traditionally practiced by a small, homogeneous, rural group living in relative isolation from other groups.

What is cultural and social determinism? ›

(*cultural determinism, social shaping) In theories of the relationship between society and technology or media, a stance which asserts the primacy of social (and political) factors rather than the autonomous influence of the medium (whether this is language or a technology).

Is determinism a theory? ›

Determinism is a philosophical view where all events are determined completely by previously existing causes. Deterministic theories throughout the history of philosophy have developed from diverse and sometimes overlapping motives and considerations.

What is cultural determinism quizlet? ›

Cultural determinism. The idea that all human actions are the product of culture which denies the influence of other factors like physical environment and human biology on human behavior.

Who described culture as a switchman? ›

Weber's 'switchman simile': 'Not ideas, but material and ideal interests, directly govern men's conduct. Yet very frequently the 'world images' that have been created by 'ideas' have, like switchmen, determined the tracks along which action has been pushed by the dynamics of interest. '

What is the main idea of multiculturalism? ›

Multiculturalism seeks the inclusion of the views and contributions of diverse members of society while maintaining respect for their differences and withholding the demand for their assimilation into the dominant culture.

What are theories of multiculturalism? ›

Multiculturalism Theories

The two primary theories or models of multiculturalism as the manner in which different cultures are integrated into a single society are best defined by the metaphors commonly used to describe them—the “melting pot” and the “salad bowl” theories.

Who came up with multiculturalism? ›

Now we'd like to take a few minutes to pay tribute to scholar Stuart Hall. He was widely known and respected in academic circles as the godfather of multiculturalism. He died this week in England at the age of 82.

What is the difference between technological determinism and the social shaping of technology? ›

SST is concerned to explore the material consequences of different technical choices, but criticizes technological determinism, which argues that technology follows its own developmental path, outside of human influences, and in turn, influences society.

What is the difference between technological determinism and symptomatic technology? ›

Technological determinism is the view that all the technological advances allows economic development and social change. On the other hand, the symptomatic technology approach foresights the techonological innovation as a symptom and arising result of the social change.

Which of the following is an idea from the technological determinism? ›

Technological determinism (TD), simply put, is the idea that technology has important effects on our lives. This idea figures prominently in the popular imagination and political rhetoric, for example in the idea that the Internet is revolutionizing economy and society.

What is the main difference between the theories of determinism and possibilism? ›

Environmental Determinism is theory that environment causes social development or the idea that natural environment influences people. Possibilism is theory that people can adjust or overcome an environment.

How does environmental determinism seek to explain variations in cultures and societies over the face of the earth? ›

The main argument of environmental determinism states that an area's physical characteristics like climate have a substantial impact on the psychological outlook of its inhabitants. These different outlooks then spread throughout a population and help define the overall behavior and culture of a society.

What do you understand by environmental determinism explain with example? ›

Environmental determinism is the belief that the environment, specifically its physical factors such as climate, determines the patterns of human culture and societal development. In this case, climate change presents threats to the continuity of livelihoods and culture in the Arctic.

What are the 3 cultural determinants? ›

There are three cultural determinants: geography, history and religion.

What are the 5 determinants of culture? ›

Page actions. Determinants of culture in organizations include several areas: technology, organizational structure, ethical norms, beliefs and attitudes and behaviour of people.

What are the 4 types of culture? ›

4 Types of Corporate Culture
  • Clan Culture.
  • Adhocracy Culture.
  • Market Culture.
  • Hierarchy Culture.
Jun 16, 2021

What is the concept of social determinism? ›

Social determinism is the theory that social interactions and constructs alone determine individual behavior (as opposed to biological or objective factors).

What is a cultural perspective give an example? ›

“Cultural perspective refers to the way that individuals are shaped by their environments as well as social and cultural factors. Such factors include a person's nationality, race and gender.”

What is the theory of cultural materialism? ›

Cultural Materialists believe that all societies operate according to a model in which production and reproduction dominate and determine the other sectors of culture (See Key Concepts 'Priority of Infrastructure'), effectively serving as the driving forces behind all cultural development.

What are the three types of determinism? ›

They are: logical determinism, theological determinism, psychological determinism, and physical determinism. Logical determinism maintains that the future is already fixed as unalterably as the past. Theological determinism argues that since God is omniscient, He knows everything, the future included.

What is the opposite of social determinism? ›

Social determinism is the opposite of biological determinism, but both theories imply that individuals have little or no control their actions, bodies, or decisions. Biological determinism has been used to explain crime, mental illness, patriarchy, and poverty or to defend eugenics and Social Darwinism.

How does determinism affect society? ›

Technological determinism argues that institutions, societies, culture and economics evolve because of developments in technology. Technology affects all people in all situations in the same way and at the same pace. In order words, technology shapes our society.

What is new determinism? ›

Neo-determinism is also called "Stop and go determinism" because it believes that if human activities (pollution) cause long-term damage to the environment then such activities should be stopped otherwise humans can do everything that the environment allows us to do.

What is another word for determinism? ›

In this page you can discover 16 synonyms, antonyms, idiomatic expressions, and related words for determinism, like: predeterminism, reductionism, relativism, determinist, rationality, essentialism, subjectivism, indeterminism, causality, dualism and materialism.

What did Weber mean by a switchman analogy? ›

Weber introduces the idea of culture as a "switchman" to portray how ideas can direct dominant culture through material interests. Using this example, he outlines a set of tracks and describes how ideas influence paths, and the tracks indicate how money is spent.

What is culture for Weber? ›

In Weber's work, the cultural basis of existence can be identified in the following excerpt: "The transcendental premise of any science of culture is (…) in the circumstance that we are man of culture, endowed with the capacity and the will of assuming a conscious position in the face of the world conferring sense to ...

What trend was Weber most concerned about in modern Western societies? ›

Weber was concerned with how the nature and organization of power was changing in modern western societies. It was becoming "rationalized," of course, but there is more to it than that. His often abstract efforts to conceptualize power are aimed at this issue.

What are the three main models of multiculturalism? ›

Three kinds of multiculturalism can be identified as coexisting in the same society: ethnic, linguistic, and national multiculturalism.

What are the 4 principles of multiculturalism? ›

Multicultural policy and programs continue to emphasize the traditional multicultural principles of diversity, harmony, equality, resource, and overcoming barriers.

What is the difference between diversity and multiculturalism? ›

Introduction. Diversity can be defined as variety or having different elements. When applied to people, diversity then includes the kinds of differences that are reflected in multiple races, ethnicities, and cultures. The term multiculturalism similarly recognizes the various cultures that make up humanity.

What are the characteristics of multiculturalism? ›

A multicultural practice means that there will be fair and equitable treatment of others by individuals, groups, and institutions. Instead of racism and discrimination, there will be respectful and equal treatment of individuals and groups from any ethnic, racial, or immigrant background.

Why is multiculturalism important in society? ›

Multiculturalism has many benefits. The main one is that it encourages open-mindedness amongst different groups of people and it dispels negative stereotypes. This is extremely important as the UN reported that 1/3 of the world's major conflicts have a cultural dimension to them.

What are the benefits of multiculturalism? ›

Multiculturalism promotes the integration of different cultures and the sharing of one's ideas and perspectives. The sharing of ideas can lead to new innovations for businesses and more prosperous working relationships.

What was the first multicultural civilization? ›

The first cultural contacts began in the Sumerian seaside ports in the Persian Gulf in the 4th millennium BC. By the later third millennium, the Semitic Akkadians had taken over political rule in Mesopotamia, which led to bilingualism, since the Sumerian language remained in use for ritual and religion.

What are examples of multiculturalism? ›

Multiculturalism is the practice of giving equal attention to many different backgrounds in a particular setting. An example of multiculturalism is an honors classroom with students from several different countries and who speak different languages.

Which country is the most multicultural? ›

Many of us have always known Australia is a successful multicultural nation but now we can boast about the fact that Australia is the most ethnically diverse country in the world.

What are cultural determinants? ›

Cultural determinants include ethnicity, race, country of origin, language, non verbal communication, acculturation, gender, age, sexual orientation, values, behavior norms, rules, manners, social grouping and relationships, religious and spiritual beliefs, socioeconomic class and education.

How does cultural determinism work? ›

the theory or premise that individual and group characteristics and behavior patterns are produced largely by a given society's economic, social, political, and religious organization.

What is determined by culture? ›

Culturally determined characteristics include: the language spoken at home; religious observances; customs (including marriage customs that often accompany religious and other beliefs); acceptable gender roles and occupations; dietary practices; intellectual, artistic, and leisure-time pursuits; and other aspects of ...

Why is cultural determinism considered a problematic perspective? ›

Why does the author of the text suggest that cultural determinism is a troublesome perspective? Because it assumes that culture has more power over individuals than it really does. Culture traditionally practiced by a small, homogeneous, rural group living in relative isolation from other groups.

What are the 3 cultural determinants? ›

There are three cultural determinants: geography, history and religion.

What are the 5 determinants of culture? ›

Page actions. Determinants of culture in organizations include several areas: technology, organizational structure, ethical norms, beliefs and attitudes and behaviour of people.

What are the 4 types of culture? ›

4 Types of Corporate Culture
  • Clan Culture.
  • Adhocracy Culture.
  • Market Culture.
  • Hierarchy Culture.
Jun 16, 2021

What is cultural determinism quizlet? ›

Cultural determinism. The idea that all human actions are the product of culture which denies the influence of other factors like physical environment and human biology on human behavior.

What is cultural and social determinism? ›

(*cultural determinism, social shaping) In theories of the relationship between society and technology or media, a stance which asserts the primacy of social (and political) factors rather than the autonomous influence of the medium (whether this is language or a technology).

Is determinism a theory? ›

Determinism is a philosophical view where all events are determined completely by previously existing causes. Deterministic theories throughout the history of philosophy have developed from diverse and sometimes overlapping motives and considerations.

What are the factors affecting cultural differences? ›

Education, social standing, religion, personality, belief structure, past experience, affection shown in the home, and a myriad of other factors will affect human behavior and culture. Sure there are differences in approach as to what is considered polite and appropriate behavior both on and off the job.

How does culture affect our beliefs and values? ›

Our culture shapes the way we work and play, and it makes a difference in how we view ourselves and others. It affects our values—what we consider right and wrong. This is how the society we live in influences our choices. But our choices can also influence others and ultimately help shape our society.

How does environmental determinism seek to explain variations in cultures and societies over the face of the earth? ›

The main argument of environmental determinism states that an area's physical characteristics like climate have a substantial impact on the psychological outlook of its inhabitants. These different outlooks then spread throughout a population and help define the overall behavior and culture of a society.

What is the concept of social determinism? ›

Social determinism is the theory that social interactions and constructs alone determine individual behavior (as opposed to biological or objective factors).

Videos

1. Alvin Plantinga: Divine Action
(Biola University)
2. SYS211 Anthropology | Lecture 2 Concept of Culture
(Logos University)
3. 2. Introduction (cont.)
(YaleCourses)
4. Theory of Anything Hosts David Deutsch
(Theory of Anything)
5. Charalambos Paraskeva CAARI Lecture
(CAARI Cyprus)
6. Determinism, Deterrence, Dialectic & D Materialism, Diminishing Returns, Double Consciousness, &...
(John Cosma)

Top Articles

You might also like

Latest Posts

Article information

Author: Msgr. Benton Quitzon

Last Updated: 09/26/2022

Views: 6468

Rating: 4.2 / 5 (43 voted)

Reviews: 82% of readers found this page helpful

Author information

Name: Msgr. Benton Quitzon

Birthday: 2001-08-13

Address: 96487 Kris Cliff, Teresiafurt, WI 95201

Phone: +9418513585781

Job: Senior Designer

Hobby: Calligraphy, Rowing, Vacation, Geocaching, Web surfing, Electronics, Electronics

Introduction: My name is Msgr. Benton Quitzon, I am a comfortable, charming, thankful, happy, adventurous, handsome, precious person who loves writing and wants to share my knowledge and understanding with you.